at Martin's Tesla Founders Blog
there is a very lively debate
on how to keep score of a business.
Most of the businesses are automakers
and the products are usually cars.
The majority camp believes that products are what matter
and the minority camp (that myself and Martin subscribe to)
value business systems as more important than business products.
In Built to Last by two Stanford Professors,
the argument is deepened further,
akin to "clock building" vs "time telling."
Clock building is focusing on things in your company's DNA,
like for Toyota, kaizen, or values like frugality that help
employees on business trips order ramen instead of sushi.
Telling time is like making a MP3 player because everyone else is.
The hybrid and electric vehicle is much like the iPod for the world'
largest business and companies are all over the place in searching
for strategies: some are product based and few are systems based.
IF I WAS TO STARTUP AN AUTOMAKER SYSTEM...
I WOULD START WITH ? ENTITIES...
but let's save that for another blog, sorry...
BACK TO TESLA FOUNDERS BLOG AND MY RESPONSE TO A BLOGGER KINDLY ANSWERING MY QUESTIONS ABOUT PATENTS AND MARTIN'S RESPONSE
One of the most lively debates appears under Martin's posts on Kaizen.
In response to my question," How many patents does the Tesla Roadster have compared to the Prius?"
"Here are some examples:" and proceeded to list some important details that obviously costs his voluntary time!
FIRST OF ALL TEG, I would really like to say THANK YOU for going out of your way to do some research and answer my question. That is very kind of you!
You have taught some of the value of a blog (as I'm new to this system, although I've been scribbling for decades)...
Back to the question about patents related to the topic of kaizen.
COMPANY OR CAR???
As Martin and I try to hit home over and over, it's about the business system and much less about the product.
Kaizen is simply one example, and it DOES NOT mean that anything Toyota touches is golden. Anyway, that system had roots in Deming's work, who had also worked with Ford. So, yes you need a team AND a system, but I argue, system first, most argue team first...
"A lot of you seem to miss my point. Kaizen applies to the way you run a factory, work with suppliers, negotiate contracts, structure the company, etc. The whole point is to encourage evolution so that your business gets better over time and learns from its mistakes.
I am talking about evolution of business processes."
THIS IS PROFOUND AND PROVED IN BUILT TO LAST!!!
SO IF WE ARE COMPARING companies and technologies under the system approach, how do we keep score???
Traditionally, we measure sales, or consumer acceptance. That to me only measures the products, half the battle. After all, a company is a collection of resources working in a unique system.
What about measuring the system???
I would argue that the patent trade war is a good place to start.
What is a patent anyway???
Well, is it not the result of several failures???
Trial and error inside of a business system.
If so, than the number of patents is a great metric for evaluating business systems (companies), especially startups that don't have customers yet.
BACK TO TEG's hard work on Tesla vs. Toyota patents. FIRST OF ALL, it's unfair to compare these two business systems, Toyota is a collection of hundreds of businesses and thousands of suppliers and tens of thousands of employees, while Tesla is a startup.
BUT, I was very curious to see if anyone out there knew that the G21 project that failed through 80 car designs to accidentally land on the Prius and filed 650 PATENTS ALONG THE WAY!!!
The bottleneck for the most successful digital automobile every produced was the high voltage controller. Even Silicon Valley knows little (has far fewer patents on than lo voltages) about high voltage.
Toyota plowed $1 billion into a secret factory head up by an engineer that started his career scrubbing catalytic converters 30 years prior, churning through the system of Kaizen, where failure in R&D is acceptable. Up in Northern Nagoya, the guy built the brains that became the Hybrid Snergy Drive. The product WAS NOT the goal, it was a system to run the first Prius because no supplier could come up with enough high quality controllers.
AGAIN THAT WAS A POTENTIAL $1,000,000,000.00 FAILURE (IRONICALLY THE SAME PRICE AS THE EV-1) WITH MANY SMALL FAILURES ALONG THE WAY THAT BECAME PATENTS (IRONICALLY HOW MANY GM EV-1 PATENTS ARE ON THE SCOREBOARD?).
So the reason I keep bringing the Prius into the picture is that VERY FEW people understand how many failures occured and how the Toyota system worked through those with a rush deadline for the Kyoto Protocol. The managers and engineers hated each other on the project.
The other misunderstanding is that people calculate the $1 billion dollar factory into just the Prius and don't realize it's a system that will probably last until Toyota's last day.
SO WHAT IS THE SCORE???
Toyota ($1 billion high voltage controller secret factory and 650 patents that became the Hybrid Synergy Drive)
GM's how many patents on E-Flex
Tesla's how many patents on energy management
Mitsubishi's how many patents on in-wheel electrics
Ford's (300+ related to the Escape hybrid) how many plug-in controller patents
Where we can get a scoreboard of patents on the high voltage race to the digital automobile???
PS I'm not asking for patent search help, as this is not an engineering scoreboard, think ESPN that reports the score on each of the sports systems running. Just the area of patents and number by company.
- ► 2009 (54)
- What is Detroit's Strategy?
- All About Electric & Hybrid Cars Nugget
- Which Business Score Counts???
- Supply and Demand for Automotive Talent
- Who will win the Lithium race?
- Who's making Lithium batteries?
- Who's making Lithium autos?
- How to study Lithium?
- Dear Director of Stanford's Global Climate & Energ...
- Future Drive Nugget
- Line Graph and Pie Chart
- Hybrid Showers
- ▼ February (12)
- ► 2007 (25)