"Within the next three or four generations
every Chrysler product will have a hybrid platform"
Chrysler President Sees Green
Jim Press is the ex-president of Toyota America
and worked his way up to a seat on the board
as the highest ranking position for a non-Japanese
for the world's number one automaker.
He now leads the challenge at Chrysler
after heading up the Prius Phenomenal
rise to ubiquity through the Hybrid!!!
SEARCH
Showing posts with label Chrysler. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chrysler. Show all posts
Saturday, March 8, 2008
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
Chrysler Dreaming
Reader's Response
John Acheson On Dreaming Of A New Chrysler
avail http://www.forbes.com/opinions/2007/03/20/chrysler-flint-comments-oped-cx_lte_0320acheson.html
It's impossible to out-innovate competitors when you're back peddling, shrinking, downsizing, reorganizing, rolling 80,000 American jobs or pursuing any of the other tactics the Big Three are today.
The output of innovation is patents from R&D cost centers. Writers often assume there can be more innovation with less dollars going to cost centers. How can this be?
The most innovative vehicles in terms of patents and sales growth cost a $1 billion or more to develop. For example, 1,000 engineers making good salaries, and a plant running triple shifts developed the Toyota Prius, which has seen more than 2,000% sales growth over the past decade.
How? Innovation in a tornado not a vacuum, and the ability to be able to steer the ship through oceans of red ink.
Back to geriatric Chrysler/Jeep building the same models for decades: How many of those ideas are products you want to innovate from the ground up?
How many patents and engineers do you want to pay for? How many cost centers do you want to run in the red before your new idea becomes a concept or showroom hit?
Where is the billion dollars per idea available for any shrinking company to pay 1,000 engineers to develop 650 patents before a car even arrives at the dealership?
And where is the time or three to five years of cash to burn into new ideas?
John Acheson
John Acheson On Dreaming Of A New Chrysler
avail http://www.forbes.com/opinions/2007/03/20/chrysler-flint-comments-oped-cx_lte_0320acheson.html
It's impossible to out-innovate competitors when you're back peddling, shrinking, downsizing, reorganizing, rolling 80,000 American jobs or pursuing any of the other tactics the Big Three are today.
The output of innovation is patents from R&D cost centers. Writers often assume there can be more innovation with less dollars going to cost centers. How can this be?
The most innovative vehicles in terms of patents and sales growth cost a $1 billion or more to develop. For example, 1,000 engineers making good salaries, and a plant running triple shifts developed the Toyota Prius, which has seen more than 2,000% sales growth over the past decade.
How? Innovation in a tornado not a vacuum, and the ability to be able to steer the ship through oceans of red ink.
Back to geriatric Chrysler/Jeep building the same models for decades: How many of those ideas are products you want to innovate from the ground up?
How many patents and engineers do you want to pay for? How many cost centers do you want to run in the red before your new idea becomes a concept or showroom hit?
Where is the billion dollars per idea available for any shrinking company to pay 1,000 engineers to develop 650 patents before a car even arrives at the dealership?
And where is the time or three to five years of cash to burn into new ideas?
John Acheson
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
About Me
- John Acheson
- Portland, OR, United States
- LinkedIn Profile http://www.linkedin.com/in/johnmba Yahoo Answers Profile http://answers.yahoo.com/my/profile;_ylt=AqUFgloHkgwIawoJS0O77lDsy6IX;_ylv=3?show=98f170ed6dadf6edd5fc239fce211dfcaa&preview=true
